Culture Jamming


 

The term “cultural jamming” was first used in 1984 by the collage band Negativland to describe billboard alteration and other forms of media sabotage (Dery 2010). Culture jamming is defined as “the manipulation of the mass media by artists and activists. The intent, in most cases, is to criticize the media’s manipulation of reality, lampoons consumerism, or question corporate power” (“Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought,” 2000). Culture jamming can be analyzed as an instance of political activism and a social movement, depending from the thematic structure of culture, place and identity.

Lievrouw defined culture jamming as one of five different genres in New Media Activism. Also Lievrouw introduces alternative computing, participatory journalism, mediated mobilization and commons knowledge in New Media Activism (Lievrouw 2011:19).

According to Dery, culture jammers are united by the shared experience of media and consumer culture, by a struggle for a ‘radically pluralistic society’, and by true freedom of expression.

Culture jamming can be form of political protest. Internet and specifically Facebook, Twitter and You Tube are the most used tools of social media, however these social networks jammers can send different reviews in communicating messages to organize the protests.

One example for using Facebook and Twitter was in Iranian election protests in June in 2009. Protestants were fighting against victory of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Iranian presidential election. Protestants were supporting opposition candidates Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi. The protests were in response to the official election result of the incumbent conservative prime minister re-election.

Iran has one of the most extensive Internet  systems in the world and is marked by aggressive online censorship policies.  Iran’s government has shut down access to Facebook in the run-up to the country’s elections in June. Internet surfers in Iran claim that the site was banned because supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi were using Facebook to disseminate the candidate’s positions (Iran blocks Facebook,” 2009). Facebook was used by protestants and activists to organize big and massive political street protest. Also, Iranian government blocked some news websites and mobile phone services including text messaging.

New Media Activism and cultural jamming represents the practice of struggling for change and can be fueled by reactionary tendencies and aims, as well as progressive (Cammaerts, B. and Carpentier, N. 2007:217). Social networks can be very useful and powerful tools for social and cultural movement and progress.

Milena

Reference:

  1.  Lievrouw, Leah (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media. Oxford: Polity Press
  2. Cammaerts, B. and Carpentier, N. (eds) (2007) Reclaiming the media: communication rights and democratic media roles. Intellect: Bristol, UK
  3. Dery, Mark (2010) New Introduction and revisited edition of Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of the Signs
  4. Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. (2000) (3 ed.). London: Haper Collins Publishers.
  5. Iran blocks Facebook. (2009, Sunday, 24 May 2009, 11:17). Sunday, 24 May 2009, 11:17. Retrieved Oct, 14 2009 
This entry was posted in cultural jamming, Facebook and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Culture Jamming

  1. Katya Maneva says:

    hi Milena,
    I enjoyed reading your sharp ideas and how you have connected them. I feel that you can work a bit more on a conclusion. I know that we are pressed by words limit but maybe you can come up with a short solid conclusion. Also, few of the sections are very good for example “One example for using Facebook and Twitter was in Iranian election protests in June in 2009. Protestants were fighting against victory of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Iranian presidential election. Protestants were support opposition candidates Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi. The protests were in response to the official election result, where the incumbent conservative prime minister was re-elected.” However, we should do a critical analyses which I (personal opinion again) don’t see much in this work.
    Please make sure you have done grammer and spell check as there are some very vivid mistakes.
    Keep up the good work! My post is comming shortly…. 🙂

  2. Katya Maneva says:

    Hey Milena,
    Your use of Lievrouw, Leah (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media book is quite good in this post, but I was thinking as an idea you might explore a bit more in terms of the relation to the development and social change as your case indicates significance of the digital revolution. I mean, in regards to the governance and civic participation as the case of the Iran Revolution is is veeery popular and widely spread. 🙂 Hope this helps!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *